13.png
13.png

Anti-Ableist Grading Practices: Rethinking Rubrics for Neurodivergent & Diverse Learners

$0.00

Conventional grading systems and rubrics frequently prioritize narrow demonstrations of knowledge—rewarding speed, verbal fluency, or memorization skills. “Anti-Ableist Grading Practices” confronts the ways these structures can inadvertently punish neurodivergent (ND) students, whose pacing or expression might differ from norms. This extended workshop dives into reworking rubrics, deadlines, and grading language to be more inclusive and reflective of varied cognitive styles. By spotlighting each learner’s unique strengths—and challenging the one-size-fits-all approach—we create a classroom environment where ND students can thrive without constant penalization for differences in processing or expression.

Conventional grading systems and rubrics frequently prioritize narrow demonstrations of knowledge—rewarding speed, verbal fluency, or memorization skills. “Anti-Ableist Grading Practices” confronts the ways these structures can inadvertently punish neurodivergent (ND) students, whose pacing or expression might differ from norms. This extended workshop dives into reworking rubrics, deadlines, and grading language to be more inclusive and reflective of varied cognitive styles. By spotlighting each learner’s unique strengths—and challenging the one-size-fits-all approach—we create a classroom environment where ND students can thrive without constant penalization for differences in processing or expression.

Key Focus Areas

  1. Unmasking Ableist Rubric Elements

    • Discover how typical expectations around neatness, speed, rigid deadlines, or forced participation can exclude those with diverse neurological needs.

  2. Reframing Grading Criteria

    • Explore flexible, strengths-based frameworks that measure true understanding rather than compliance or standard pace.

  3. Collaborative Advocacy & Accommodation

    • Learn how teachers, admins, and students can co-design creative assessment pathways—ensuring ND learners, and all students, experience fair evaluation.

Who Should Attend?

  • K–12 & College Educators
    Committed to retooling assignments so ND learners aren’t repeatedly penalized for working styles, timing differences, or communication methods.

  • Special Education & Disability Advocates
    Seeking a deeper lens on how typical rubrics unconsciously perpetuate ableist assumptions—even when teachers mean well.

  • Department Chairs & Curriculum Coordinators
    Looking to embed flexible, inclusive grading practices department- or school-wide, shaping long-term policy shifts.

  • Anyone Championing Educational Equity
    Ready to tackle the structural changes that ensure all learners have equitable opportunities to demonstrate mastery.

Learning Objectives

  1. Identify Ableist Norms in Current Rubrics

    • Spot problematic language or expectations that automatically disadvantage certain neurotypes or learning profiles.

  2. Design Accessible, Flexible Assessments

    • Acquire tools for diversifying assignment formats, pacing, and demonstration methods to capture genuine academic achievement.

  3. Sustain Inclusive Grading Dialogues

    • Build partnerships with students, families, and colleagues to revise policies, gather feedback, and anchor new practices in ongoing reflection.

Why It Matters

Too often, ND students face extra hurdles just to show what they know—resulting in poor grades that reflect their differences, not their ability or effort. When educators recognize these systemic biases and restructure grading to accommodate diverse thinking styles, we open the door to fairness and deeper engagement. “Anti-Ableist Grading Practices” equips participants with the perspective and practical steps to shift from merely checking boxes to celebrating varied expressions of learning—leading to a classroom where both ND and non-ND students can flourish on their own terms.

Is This Workshop For You?

  • Seeing ND students stumble over rubrics emphasizing speed, oral presentations, or written neatness?
    We’ll uncover alternative criteria that don’t penalize differences in pacing or format.

  • Wondering how to track growth without standard timed tests or uniform rubrics?
    Explore frameworks for measuring progress that reward deep understanding, not just rote tasks done under pressure.

  • Unsure how to handle fairness concerns when some learners need extended deadlines or alternative submissions?
    Discuss how “fair isn’t always equal,” and how thoughtful communication fosters trust and clarity among all students.

  • Wishing to seed a broader culture shift so ND-friendly grading isn’t just a perk for a few, but a baseline for everyone?
    We’ll provide strategies to scale inclusive evaluation across curricula or entire departments.

If you’re ready to uproot the hidden ableism in typical grading and embrace dynamic, respectful assessment practices, “Anti-Ableist Grading Practices” will guide you toward an equitable, student-centered classroom where diversity genuinely enhances learning for all.